
WHERE SHOULD YOU EXTRACT SOFTWARE TO SOFTWARE


Really I don't think there is a right or wrong. I would think implant would be healthier then a root canal since it would be a solid object vs a breeding ground of a dead tooth. I would guess it's possible for a root canal tooth to be infected and be unnoticed since there is no nerve. Nerves are important since it's a way for us to know if something is wrong. I'm not sure how much credit to give to the flood of articles about root canals being bad for you're health but I do think it's healthier to have the tooth removed vs kept in. Same can be said about implants but from what I can find, implants are at least 2 to 3 times longer lasting and less failure rates for the same price. They aren't likely to list failure rates and life expectancy on the same page that is selling the product. It's "A root can/could last you a life time if done properly and good care is taken." Those sites won't say the average is around 10 years. Reading up about this stuff I kept seeing a phrase that I feel is misleading. When you factor in root canal odds of re-treatment, failure rate (estimated 5-15 percent vs 2 percent), and crown replacement it's probably the same cost of an implant averaged out. Personally I wouldn't do if I needed bone graft as it increases implant failure rate. If I chose to do so at a later date for the an extra say $500 you can get an implant for the cost of root canal and crown. If a tooth is that far gone, I want it removed. I don't want to be the guy who gets told every year a new tooth needs another 2k investment to die with my original teeth in my mouth.
WHERE SHOULD YOU EXTRACT SOFTWARE TO CRACKED
One was cracked and the other needed a root canal. I haven't been the dentist since childhood. In the end it seems to be a roll of dice. You will see posts where some have had no issues 10 years down the road (which is the life expectancy of a root canal) while others a year later it's another root canal on the same tooth or even extraction. Maybe the dentist would let you pay in instalments to make a rct easier to afford.

There is no right or wrong decision, the one you make is the right one. Like you say it is your decision, I hope the replies you have had have helped you come to that decision. But you have to consider that if you lost other teeth some time down the line and this tooth could have been saved you may be glad you didn't extract it.

If it is a back tooth and no other gaps you will probably still be able to eat etc. I would always try and keep the teeth I have because I have lost quite a few of my back teeth over the years. I had a deep filling that lasted about 6 years which is the time the dentist told me it would when he did it, are you sure you aren't mixing deep fillings up with rct's in the 5 to 6 year time scale. I had a couple done about three years ago one was fine with no problems the other failed straight away but was re-treated and has been fine since. I had another that lasted for about 20 years. I have had a few rct's one is about 30 years old and has had no problems.
